
Scale-Resolving Simulation at Scale
The 2d-inc-cylinder example computes incompressible flow past a circular cylinder, producing the classic unsteady von Kármán vortex street in the wake. It is solved with the artificial-compressibility formulation and dual time stepping to recover true incompressible behavior.
- Incompressible Navier–Stokes via artificial compressibility (ζ = 2.5); a pseudo-time pressure evolution enforces the divergence-free constraint
- Bluff-body wake — periodic vortex shedding, the canonical source of unsteady lift, drag, and vortex-induced vibration
- Dual time stepping — physical SDIRK33 with RK45 pseudo-stepping and p-multigrid acceleration for efficient implicit convergence
- Grid: mixed triangle/quadrilateral mesh around the cylinder, polynomial order 3
- Flow: kinematic viscosity ν = 0.005, inflow Uin = 1.0, reference pressure Pc = 1
- Scheme: Rusanov flux, LDG viscous; dual time stepping with p-multigrid, characteristic Riemann inflow/outflow
- Time: Δt = 0.05, pseudo-Δt = 0.005, tend = 75; residuals logged to residual.csv
The core transferable physics: Flow separates from a bluff body and sheds alternating vortices, driving unsteady forces at a well-defined shedding frequency. This is the root cause of vortex-induced vibration, aeolian tones, and wake buffeting across cars, bridges, risers, and heat exchangers.
Artificial compressibility with dual time stepping enforces the divergence-free constraint, recovering genuine incompressible wake dynamics.
High-order accuracy captures the Strouhal number and unsteady lift/drag that drive vortex-induced vibration and fatigue.
p-multigrid acceleration makes the implicit pseudo-time solve fast, so long-time unsteady wake statistics are affordable.
Triangle/quad meshing handles arbitrary bluff-body geometry — cylinders, risers, cables, tubes — on unstructured grids.
Select a domain to see how this simulation applies, with industry-specific scenarios and ROI.
Vehicle aerodynamics, cooling-airflow, and wind noise are shaped by bluff-body vortex shedding from mirrors, antennas, A-pillars, and underbody components. Unsteady wakes drive drag, buffeting, and tonal noise that customers hear and regulators measure.
- Mirror and antenna wakes generate aeolian tones and side-glass buffeting — a top NVH complaint.
- Cooling-package and underbody drag from separated wakes directly reduces range/economy.
Aero-driven range/economy and NVH rework are worth tens of millions across a vehicle program.
| Application | How this simulation maps |
|---|---|
| Mirror wake & wind noise | Vortex shedding frequency predicts aeolian tones and side-glass buffeting |
| Antenna / roof-rack VIV | Shedding-driven vibration predicted from unsteady lift on cylindrical parts |
| Cooling-duct bluff bodies | Wake losses behind heat-exchanger tubes and struts inform cooling drag |
| Underbody component drag | Separated wakes behind cylindrical members quantified for drag reduction |
Scenario: An OEM uses vortex-shedding simulation to redesign mirror and antenna shapes, cutting wind-noise rework and shaving drag across a 300,000-unit program.
The drag reduction adds fleet economy/range value that typically exceeds the development savings.
Validate the shedding frequency
Run the case and confirm the Strouhal number and unsteady lift/drag match the known cylinder benchmark at your Reynolds number.
Sweep Reynolds number
Vary ν and inflow speed to map the shedding-frequency and force response across your operating range.
Apply to your bluff body
Swap in your geometry — mirror, riser, tube, or stack — and evaluate VIV, drag, and suppression options.
Run this example on SRS's cloud platform. No installation, no infrastructure management — just results.
For questions or to schedule a technical briefing, contact the SRS simulation team.
© 2026 SRS, a NumericalAI product by Empirisch Tech GmbH (empirischtech.at). All rights reserved. |Privacy Policy |Terms of Service |Executive brief |FAQ