SRS Logo

SRS

Scale-Resolving Simulation at Scale

Business Case

Resolving Shock–Boundary-Layer Interaction with the Viscous Shock Tube

Example: 2d-viscous-shock-tube
  • Aerospace
  • Energy
  • Manufacturing

What This Simulation Does

The 2d-viscous-shock-tube example runs a shock tube at moderate Reynolds number where the propagating shock interacts with the wall boundary layer, producing a complex lambda-shock structure and vortex roll-up near the wall. It couples strong shock capturing with viscous boundary-layer resolution in a single run.

- Compressible Navier–Stokes with viscous stress and heat conduction plus entropy-filter shock capturing

- Shock/boundary-layer interaction — the shock's interaction with the wall layer creates the lambda-foot and separation physics that dominate real high-speed flows

- Wall heat transfer — no-slip adiabatic and slip adiabatic walls exercise the near-wall thermal physics

Key Parameters

- Grid: quadrilateral elements, polynomial order 4; Gauss–Legendre points

- Fluid: ideal gas γ = 1.4, μ = 2 × 10-4, Pr = 0.73

- States: left (ρ, p) = (120, 85.714), right (1.2, 0.857)

- Scheme: HLLC flux, LDG viscous (β = 0.5, τ = 0.1), entropy filter (2 iters), RK4; Δt = 5 × 10-5, tend = 1

The core transferable physics: A moving shock meets a viscous wall layer, separates it, and rolls it into vortices. This shock/boundary-layer interaction (SBLI) is the single most consequential phenomenon in high-speed inlets, transonic wings, and gun/launch tubes — and it is precisely where inviscid solvers fail and low-order viscous solvers smear the answer.


What Makes This Capability Unique

Shocks + viscosity together

Captures strong shocks and resolves the boundary layer in the same solver — the exact combination needed for SBLI, without operator-splitting compromises.

Order-4 near-wall accuracy

High polynomial order resolves the lambda-foot and separation bubble on far fewer cells than a low-order solver would require.

Wall heat-flux fidelity

LDG viscous treatment delivers the near-wall gradients that set heat flux and skin friction — the loads that size structures and cooling.

Cloud GPU, no HPC

Launch a resolved SBLI benchmark from the browser on enterprise GPUs — no local build, mesh tooling, or cluster procurement.


Domain Applications

Select a domain to see how this simulation applies, with industry-specific scenarios and ROI.

The Problem

Transonic wings, supersonic inlets, and control surfaces are governed by shock/boundary-layer interaction. SBLI causes buffet, separation, inlet unstart, and localized heating — the phenomena that most directly limit the flight envelope and drive certification risk.

- Transonic buffet onset is set by shock-induced separation; predicting it needs a resolved viscous shock interaction, not an inviscid estimate.

- Inlet unstart from SBLI can be catastrophic for a supersonic engine; simulation identifies the margin.

Buffet/SBLI-driven redesign late in a program routinely costs $10–50M.

Applications

ApplicationHow this simulation maps
Transonic buffet predictionLambda-shock and separation physics map to shock-induced buffet onset on a wing
Supersonic inlet SBLIShock–boundary-layer interaction predicts separation and unstart margin
Control-surface hinge loadsShock impingement on a deflected surface sets peak pressure and heating
Nozzle flow separationOver-expanded nozzle separation and side loads driven by SBLI

Quantifiable Business Value

Scenario: An airframer uses resolved SBLI simulation to find buffet onset early, avoiding a late wing redesign discovered only in flight test.

MetricLate discoverySimulation-led
Buffet issue found atflight testdesign phase
Redesign + retest cost$30,000,000$4,000,000
Schedule slip9 months1 month
Avoided cost$26,000,000

Schedule protection often dwarfs the direct redesign savings on a competitive program.


Recommended Next Steps

1

Verify the SBLI structure

Run the case and confirm the lambda-foot, separation bubble, and near-wall vortex roll-up are resolved at your mesh and order.

2

Sweep Reynolds and shock strength

Vary viscosity and pressure ratio to bracket the separation and heat-load regimes relevant to your hardware.

3

Move to your geometry

Apply the verified viscous + shock-capturing settings to your inlet, blade row, or nozzle.

Ready to Run This Simulation?

Run this example on SRS's cloud platform. No installation, no infrastructure management — just results.

For questions or to schedule a technical briefing, contact the SRS simulation team.

Scale-Resolving Simulation (SRS)

© 2026 SRS, a NumericalAI product by Empirisch Tech GmbH (empirischtech.at). All rights reserved. |Privacy Policy |Terms of Service |Executive brief |FAQ

We use cookies to enhance your experience

We use cookies to provide essential functionality, analyze usage, and improve our services. Privacy Policy