SRS Logo

SRS

Scale-Resolving Simulation at Scale

Business Case

Resolving Separated Flow over a 3D Triangular Aerofoil

Example: 3d-triangular-aerofoil
  • Aerospace
  • Automotive
  • Energy

What This Simulation Does

The 3d-triangular-aerofoil example runs a fully three-dimensional, scale-resolving simulation of turbulent, separated flow over a sharp-edged aerofoil section. Fixed separation at the sharp edges produces a strongly three-dimensional turbulent wake — the archetype of massively separated external aerodynamics where RANS turbulence models are unreliable.

- Compressible Navier–Stokes resolved in 3D; high-order flux reconstruction acts as implicit LES in the separated wake

- Fixed-separation bluff aerofoil — sharp edges pin the separation line, giving a repeatable, mesh-robust test of unsteady loads and wake structure

- Unstructured 3D meshing — mixed elements around a real section geometry with wall-resolved near-body layers

Key Parameters

- Grid: unstructured 3D mesh (mixed elements), high polynomial order; wall-resolved near-body layers

- Physics: compressible Navier–Stokes, scale-resolving (implicit LES)

- Scheme: Riemann flux with LDG viscous treatment; explicit high-order time integration

- Diagnostics: time-averaged surface loads and wake statistics for lift, drag, and shedding content

The core transferable physics: Flow separates from a body and forms an unsteady, three-dimensional turbulent wake that drives fluctuating forces. This is exactly the regime — massively separated external aerodynamics — where RANS fails and scale-resolving simulation is the only reliable predictor of drag, unsteady loads, and wake-induced noise.


What Makes This Capability Unique

Scale-resolving where RANS fails

High-order implicit LES resolves the separated wake directly, capturing unsteady loads and shedding that RANS models systematically miss.

Unsteady load prediction

Time-resolved surface loads give the fluctuating lift/drag and spectral content that drive fatigue, buffet, and aeroacoustic noise.

Real geometry on GPUs

Unstructured 3D meshing on real section geometry, solved on cloud GPUs — full external-aero LES without HPC procurement.

Sharp-edge robustness

Fixed separation at sharp edges makes the case mesh-robust and repeatable — an honest stress test of 3D wall-bounded LES.


Domain Applications

Select a domain to see how this simulation applies, with industry-specific scenarios and ROI.

The Problem

High-angle-of-attack aerodynamics, deployed high-lift devices, and store/airframe wakes are massively separated flows. RANS mis-predicts separation onset and unsteady loads here, forcing costly conservatism or late flight-test surprises.

- Stall and post-stall loads govern control authority and structural sizing; separated-wake fidelity is essential.

- Buffet and unsteady loading from separated wakes drive fatigue and ride quality.

A separation-related redesign found in flight test can cost $10–50M and slip a program by months.

Applications

ApplicationHow this simulation maps
High-AoA / stall loadsSeparated-wake LES predicts post-stall unsteady lift/drag that RANS misses
High-lift device wakeSharp-edge separation maps to slat/flap edge vortices and their unsteady loads
Buffet / fatigue loadingTime-resolved surface loads feed structural fatigue and buffet assessment
Airframe-noise sourcesResolved wake turbulence identifies edge-noise sources for low-noise design

Quantifiable Business Value

Scenario: An airframer uses scale-resolving simulation to characterize separated high-lift loads in the design phase, catching a buffet issue before flight test and avoiding a late structural redesign.

MetricRANS-ledLES-led
Separated-load prediction error20–40%5–10%
Late-redesign risk25%6%
Redesign cost$25,000,000$25,000,000
Expected redesign cost$6,250,000$1,500,000
Expected savings$4,750,000

Avoiding a flight-test-driven schedule slip is often worth more to the program than the redesign cost itself.


Recommended Next Steps

1

Establish the separated-wake baseline

Run the case and extract time-averaged loads and shedding content to establish your scale-resolving baseline.

2

Sweep angle and Reynolds number

Vary incidence and inflow to map the separated-load and wake response across your operating envelope.

3

Apply to your geometry

Swap in your section, blade, or body and run a production LES for drag, unsteady loads, and wake noise.

Ready to Run This Simulation?

Run this example on SRS's cloud platform. No installation, no infrastructure management — just results.

For questions or to schedule a technical briefing, contact the SRS simulation team.

Scale-Resolving Simulation (SRS)

© 2026 SRS, a NumericalAI product by Empirisch Tech GmbH (empirischtech.at). All rights reserved. |Privacy Policy |Terms of Service |Executive brief |FAQ

We use cookies to enhance your experience

We use cookies to provide essential functionality, analyze usage, and improve our services. Privacy Policy